
The withdrawal of security personnel assigned to Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya has sparked heightened political tension and concern over the safety of the county’s top leadership. According to the governor, officers who were guarding his official residence and escort detail were pulled out at exactly midnight on Wednesday, leaving him fully exposed despite recent threats.
This move comes just days after the governor and his entourage were violently attacked on Saturday, November 22, during a political engagement at Chwele Ward in Kabuchai, Bungoma County. Armed individuals are reported to have ambushed the governor, damaging vehicles and obstructing the event. The same group allegedly proceeded to vandalize the residence of Kabuchai Member of Parliament Majimbo Kalasinga.
Images and video from the scene trended widely online, showing shattered windscreens and bullet-riddled frames of the governor’s motorcade. Natembeya claims he narrowly escaped serious harm after the attackers shot at him repeatedly as they disrupted the rally.
The incident has now evolved into a fresh battleground in the longstanding political rivalry between Natembeya and National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetangula. The governor has publicly accused Wetangula of orchestrating the violence and misusing state resources for political intimidation.
Speaking as he toured the damaged Kalasinga homestead, Natembeya strongly condemned the incident:
“This is so primitive, it is not politics,” he said. “Wabunge wa Kenya, huyu ndio Chairman wenu anafanya mambo kama hii… Your leader in the National Assembly is the one doing these things. Sending goons to come and destroy the home of a member of the National Assembly… because they have a different political opinion.”
The events have triggered public debate over the weaponization of state institutions, the fragility of political tolerance, and the growing trend of intimidation in Kenya’s local politics. Citizens and governance observers are also questioning why security was withdrawn from a governor precisely at a time of heightened threat, and whether this decision was influenced by political pressure.
As investigations continue, the situation underscores the urgent need for political decency, accountability, and reforms in how security is allocated to public officials — especially in volatile environments.